They say evesdroppers seldom hear good of themselves.
But sometimes, it seems, it is the 'evesdroppee' who ends up worse off.
Like this.
There is an argument for saying that when the private becomes public there is always going to be trouble.
And I believe there are strong moral imperatives for respecting people's privacy.
The question is, where do you draw the line?
At what point does it become in the public interest for someone's privacy to be breached?
Not that I feel sorry for
Mr Triesman.
Irrespective of the validity of his comments, they were inappropriate by any standards.
What I do question, however, is the motive behind they way the story has been handled.
The incident could, for example, have been reported to a higher authority. The Committee to whom Mr T was responsible for example?
And then, some way agreed, privately, for him to resign without this becoming a very public issue.
Not because I care about him.
But I fear for the damage this may do to our World Cup 2018 bid.
Which brings me back to my point about motivation.
There are
dark forces at work methinks.
2 comments:
There is an argument for saying that when the private becomes public there is always going to be trouble.
garment stitching unit
cut and sew clothing manufacturers near me
jordan 6
kyrie irving shoes
golden goose
fear of god
off white nike
bape clothing
yeezy outlet
palm angels hoodie
jordan 1 off white
supreme hoodie
Post a Comment